This is the big question if the remains found in Leicestershire really are those of King Richard III. Some say throw them back in the hole (because the Tudors say he was a villain) while others, not succumbing to Tudor propaganda, say it would show respect to bury him in York Minster where he wanted to be interred and where Yorkists feel he belongs. What do you say?
- You are here :
- Cassandra Clark Blog
- /Cassandra Clark Posts /
- Where shall we inter the bones?
There are 4 comments left Go To Comment
Leave a Reply Cancle Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Subscribe to our Newsletter
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Cassandra on Medieval democracy
- Miriam on Where shall we inter the bones?
- Cassandra on Where shall we inter the bones?
- Cassandra on Where shall we inter the bones?
- Inktwala Meredith on Where shall we inter the bones?
Recent Tweets
-
RT @AmyJeffs0: That’ll learn him.
Geoffrey of Monmouth’s ‘History of the Kings of Britain’, translated by Lewis Thorpe
https://t.co/WrRuRtRuJN
7 hours ago -
RT @AmyJeffs0: He came down on top of the Temple of Apollo in the town of Trinovantum [which became London] and was dashed into co… https://t.co/oDBqJhCeAB
7 hours ago -
RT @Epicurus300: @lennietudor78 @thetroubleshot Has to be Nigel, but really, i dont think the eu should be demanding anything
7 hours ago -
https://t.co/qf0XBTQZfM
7 hours ago
Archives
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- August 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- January 2018
- June 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- October 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- April 2014
- February 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- April 2012
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- July 2011
- March 2011
- November 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
They’ve just confirmed on the news that the remains are those of Richard. Wherever he is re-interred, it must surely be with a Catholic order of service – there was no Church of England in his day!
Yes, it’s great news as it answers some of the rumours about Richard III spread by his arch enemies the usurping Tudors. Now perhaps we can rethink his illustrious Plantagenet predecessor, Richard II. He was buried by Henry V, the son of his murderer, in Westminster Abbey. To disinter him might show once and for all whether he was butchered to death or merely starved. Grim either way. But at least we would know.
As for Richard III, why not Westminster Abbey along with the other Plantagenet kings? I’m all for a big state funeral.
You must read super fast! I was a bookworm in my teens, 20 s and early 30 s and your quote is so true books that you rlaely like stay with you forever. Happy OYGIF!